Category: Jurisprudence and Rulings (Fiqh)
Fatwa#: 39962
Asked Country: Bangladesh

Answered Date: Feb 15,2018

Title: Are the views of Sahbain (rahimahumallah) actually the views of Imaam Abu Hanifa (rahimahullah)?


Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim
Respected Ulama e Keram
Assalamu Alaikum Oa Rahmatullah Oa Barakaatuh
I have heard from an Alim the following statement:- 
Imam Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad (Rahimahumallah) had no personal / own opinion (Fatwa).Their opinion is actually one of the opinions of their respected teacher Imam Abu Hanifah (Rahimahullah). This is because Imam Abu Hanifah Rahimahullah is Mujtahid but Sahebain rahimahumallah are Muqallid.    
Is this statement is correct ? 
Jammalakumullahu Ta'aalaa bil 'Aafiyah. Ameen.
Was Salam- 


In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, The Most Merciful.

As-salaamu `alaykum wa-ramatullahi wa-barakatuh.

The discussion in reference is intricate and of an academic nature which is beyond the general understanding of people not having understanding on Fiqh and principles of Fiqh.

The first statement of the Aalim is correct. However, Imaam Abu Yusuf and Imaam Muhammad (rahimahumallah) were also Mujtahids of their own right. In order to understand this angel one requires a scholarly background in Fiqh.[1]

And Allah Ta`ala Knows Best.

Hussein Muhammad.

Student Darul Iftaa

Arusha, Tanzania

Checked and Approved by:

Mufti Ebrahim Desai.


واذا بقول واحد منهم يعلم قطعا انه يكون به آخذا بقول ابي حنيفة. فانه روى عن جميع أصحابه من الكبار كابي يوسف ومحمد وزفر والحسن انهم قالوا: ما قلنا في مسألة قولا الا وهو روايتنا عن ابي حنيفة واقسموا عليه أيمانا غلاظا.

شرح عقود رسم المفتي. مكتبة دار العلوم كراشي  Pg 66.

DISCLAIMER - questions answers issues pertaining to Shar'ah. Thereafter, these questions and answers are placed for public view on for educational purposes. However, many of these answers are unique to a particular scenario and cannot be taken as a basis to establish a ruling in another situation or another environment. bears no responsibility with regards to these questions being used out of their intended context.
  • The Shar's ruling herein given is based specifically on the question posed and should be read in conjunction with the question.
  • bears no responsibility to any party who may or may not act on this answer and is being hereby exempted from loss or damage howsoever caused.
  • This answer may not be used as evidence in any Court of Law without prior written consent of
  • Any or all links provided in our emails, answers and articles are restricted to the specific material being cited. Such referencing should not be taken as an endorsement of other contents of that website.